The victim was in Grade 6 when the two began a sexual relationship.In court, the girl said that Louvelle got her pregnant, and that on four separate occasions he jumped on her stomach in an effort to terminate the pregnancy.Justice Alan Seaborn wrote in his decision that he believed the girl's claims to be true, but he was unable to find Louvelle guilty of assault because he could not prove the girl did not consent to it.
The kid was TWELVE. A twelve year old child cannot consent to sex with a twenty-one year old man. Full stop, no exceptions. She most certainly can't consent to a grown man jumping on her stomach because he had sex with her and got her knocked up. What the hell is wrong with this fucking dipshit judge if he thinks a little kid can consent to sex and assault? That's not even how the law works! That's statutory rape, even if she said yes she still wasn't consenting because a) a kid doesn't have the knowledge, experience or physical development to fully consent to something like that and b) IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO HAVE SEX WITH A KID EVEN IF THE KID SAYS YES, BECAUSE KIDS CANNOT CONSENT TO SEX. Also, kids can't consent to getting jumped on to terminate a pregnancy. Jesus fucking christ. I can't fucking believe this fucker is in charge of judge stuff, since he is clearly incompetent. I mean, I could understand if he went down the "we don't have proof it happened" road, but this whole consent bullshit, are you kidding me?
No comments:
Post a Comment